Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 2, 2019 at 1:25 vote accept Lorenz H Menke
Mar 21, 2015 at 0:54 comment added Lorenz H Menke Yes there are two such polynomials. My notation was not very clear. Take all upper or all lower signs for the two cases. The above solution is essentially correct with a correction that the resulting polynomial in x is the form $a {x}^3 + b {x}^2 + c x$. This factors as x times a quadratic. Solving the quadratic results in a quartic discriminant. This converts to an elliptic curve with a couple of torsion points. There is one generator point hence an infinite number of solutions which is what I was looking for. Thank you all for the suggestions on the original algebraic manipulation.
Mar 19, 2015 at 0:46 comment added j.c. I agree; that's how I read the question as well.
Mar 18, 2015 at 12:46 comment added Felipe Voloch @j.c. But then wouldn't changing $\eta$ to $-\eta$ switch between the two?
Mar 18, 2015 at 2:17 comment added j.c. I believe that there are two different polynomials under consideration, one where you always take the upper signs so that $\beta_\pm=\beta_+$ and $\beta_\mp=\beta_-$, and similarly, another polynomial corresponding to the lower signs.
Mar 17, 2015 at 17:19 comment added Felipe Voloch But what does it actually mean? I would understand $\beta_+ = 1 + \eta, \beta_- = 1 - \eta$ but I don't actually know the difference between $1 \pm \eta$ and $1 \mp \eta$.
Mar 17, 2015 at 17:17 comment added Felipe Voloch @j.c. Oh, I missed that, there are two different betas in the polynomial. I need to redo this. Thanks.
Mar 17, 2015 at 4:38 comment added j.c. Unless I'm missing something, you get a different polynomial if you replace both $\beta_\pm$ and $\beta_\mp$ by the same variable $x$.
Mar 17, 2015 at 1:52 history answered Felipe Voloch CC BY-SA 3.0