Timeline for Collatz property implying infinite "fall below" trajectories, is it known?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 15, 2015 at 18:30 | comment | added | vzn | thx for further attn however afaik collatz implies the "fall below" property highlighted in the question for an infinite # of cases but not vice versa as your answer seems to assert. but the strict formulation of the property is more found in the followup comments. suggest/ encourage further discussion/ clarification in number theory chat | |
| Mar 15, 2015 at 12:50 | history | answered | Gottfried Helms | CC BY-SA 3.0 |