Timeline for Bi-Lipschitz constant of arc-length parametrisation of convex curve
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 15, 2015 at 20:55 | history | edited | user66638 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Mar 10, 2015 at 17:31 | comment | added | j.c. | Could the title be perhaps made more specific? | |
Mar 9, 2015 at 20:02 | history | edited | user66638 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 14 characters in body
|
Mar 8, 2015 at 16:17 | answer | added | MrSelberg | timeline score: 2 | |
Mar 8, 2015 at 5:21 | answer | added | Christian Remling | timeline score: 1 | |
Mar 7, 2015 at 18:33 | comment | added | Christian Remling | Yes, I was confused, obviously the quotient is $\simeq 1$ for small intervals. | |
Mar 7, 2015 at 8:16 | comment | added | user66638 | "Then your quotient \sim 1/L", this looks false @ Christian. Indeed in that case it is \sim 1 namely \int_0^p e^{i L s} ds= {-((i (-1 + e^{i L p))}/L)} | |
Mar 6, 2015 at 18:32 | history | asked | user66638 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |