Timeline for Publication in proceedings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2016 at 14:05 | vote | accept | Sebastien Palcoux | ||
| Mar 31, 2015 at 12:55 | comment | added | Andreas Blass | @SébastienPalcoux The word "Proceedings" in the title of a journal tells me nothing about the quality of the Journal. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. is a high quality journal. (Full disclosure: Some years ago, I was on its editorial board.) Proc. Indian ... might also be a good journal, but I'd have to check; I never heard of it until just now, and that makes me a little suspicious. | |
| Mar 31, 2015 at 11:55 | comment | added | Sebastien Palcoux | You talk about "conference proceedings", but there exist journals which are not "conference proceedings" but which still contains the word "proceedings" in their name (for examples: Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. or Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. Math. Sci.). Do you think that mathematicians can also be suspicious about papers published in such journals? | |
| Mar 4, 2015 at 2:30 | comment | added | Timothy Chow | Various mathematical societies sometimes publish conference proceedings as books. For example, the American Mathematical Society series Contemporary Mathematics is one such. In order to counteract the suspicion that you mention, the AMS requires that the articles be fully refereed, and they also discourage the editors from putting "Proceedings" in the title. | |
| Mar 3, 2015 at 20:46 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Mar 3, 2015 at 15:35 | history | answered | Andreas Blass | CC BY-SA 3.0 |