Timeline for De Rham cohomology and antiderivatives
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 30, 2010 at 23:52 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | The consensus seems to be to just add (a generic element of) $\ker d$. This obviously gives something sensible, but it's unsatisfying to me. Seems like I was looking for something where there's nothing. | |
| Mar 30, 2010 at 22:53 | history | answered | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |