Timeline for Are Zariski connected and closed semisimple subgroups of semisimple and simply connected algebraic groups again simply connected? [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 2, 2015 at 23:23 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Amir: Your definition of "simply connected" is too narrow for this kind of question, which makes sense and has a similar easy answer over any algebraically closed field. Aside from that, there are already questions on MO which cover similar ground in a more refined style. Search for "simply connected" [algebraic-groups]. | |
Mar 2, 2015 at 23:11 | history | closed |
Venkataramana YCor Joonas Ilmavirta abx Johannes Hahn |
Not suitable for this site | |
Mar 2, 2015 at 19:33 | vote | accept | Amir | ||
Mar 2, 2015 at 17:23 | answer | added | Dave Witte Morris | timeline score: 3 | |
Mar 2, 2015 at 17:19 | history | edited | Max Horn | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Make sure title and question match
|
Mar 2, 2015 at 17:08 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 2, 2015 at 23:11 | |||||
Mar 2, 2015 at 16:54 | comment | added | Venkataramana | No. $H$ need not be simply connected | |
Mar 2, 2015 at 16:18 | review | First posts | |||
Mar 2, 2015 at 16:19 | |||||
Mar 2, 2015 at 16:18 | history | asked | Amir | CC BY-SA 3.0 |