Timeline for Tensor calculus on the frame bundle
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2015 at 17:45 | comment | added | Deane Yang | There is a natural identification between a tangent frame and a cotangent frame, so it's moot where you want to do it. Geometrically, it's more natural (at least for me) to work with differential forms on frames of tangent vectors. | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 17:14 | comment | added | Bilateral | Could this be related to using instead of the principal bundle associated to the tangent bundle, the principal bundle associated to the cotangent bundle? | |
| Mar 2, 2015 at 17:03 | comment | added | Bilateral | That is indeed interesting Deane. I hope Robert can comment on this. In fact, I think he uses this formalism in his popular paper "Remarks on $G_{2}$-structures", if I am not mistaken. | |
| Mar 1, 2015 at 21:08 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 256 characters in body
|
| Mar 1, 2015 at 19:39 | history | answered | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 3.0 |