Timeline for Residual finiteness: why do we care?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2015 at 12:14 | comment | added | JBorger | In the early days, I thought that the only reason they didn't name it stackoverflow was that the name was already taken... | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 9:33 | comment | added | Martin Brandenburg | Interesting answer. Judging on the popularity of the different subjects discussed on mathoverflow, we should perhaps rename it as AGflow. (Not to be confused with agflow.com) | |
| Aug 17, 2015 at 8:57 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body
|
| Aug 2, 2015 at 7:21 | history | edited | ThiKu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
\pi_1^{top}(X) is residually finite, not X
|
| Mar 2, 2015 at 10:11 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 332 characters in body
|
| Feb 27, 2015 at 17:49 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Feb 27, 2015 at 9:13 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 1 character in body
|
| Feb 26, 2015 at 20:43 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 26, 2015 at 20:29 | history | edited | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 20 characters in body
|
| Feb 26, 2015 at 20:12 | history | answered | Francesco Polizzi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |