Timeline for Axioms for sheaf cohomology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 20, 2015 at 15:40 | comment | added | user62675 | Yeah, I see that my suggestion wasn't right. Thanks! | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 14:43 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=62675 by developer User.Id=36770 | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 14:14 | comment | added | Tyler Lawson | @SanathDevalapurkar I'm a little bit confused by your suggestion, because it seems that such a definition would cut off some of the long exact sequence if $n > 0$, and if $n < 0$ it would mean the same as if $n=0$ (where it is true). | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 3:31 | comment | added | user62675 | Me and Elden had a discussion on facebook - isn't $\mathrm{H}^q(\mathcal{F})=\prod^q_{i=n}\mathrm{H}^i(X,\mathcal{F})$ also a sheafy cohomology theory in the revised definition? | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 3:11 | comment | added | user62675 | That's a pretty neat example. Thanks! | |
| Feb 20, 2015 at 2:43 | history | edited | Tyler Lawson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Feb 20, 2015 at 1:58 | history | answered | Tyler Lawson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |