Skip to main content
13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Apr 13, 2018 at 6:14 history edited Ben McKay CC BY-SA 3.0
spelling, grammar, formatting
Mar 30, 2010 at 3:10 answer added Richard Stanley timeline score: 6
Mar 29, 2010 at 21:29 comment added Qiaochu Yuan Sure. One can reduce to subalgebras without loss of generality since the product and inverse of invertible matrices is invertible, and then you're just looking at a division algebra over R with a finite-dimensional representation. For that see en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… .
Mar 29, 2010 at 21:10 answer added Georges Elencwajg timeline score: 5
Mar 29, 2010 at 20:52 comment added zhaoliang for problem 4 , if the base field is C , the answer is 1. But if the base field is R, the answer may be greater than 1 ,right?
Mar 29, 2010 at 20:22 answer added darij grinberg timeline score: 11
Mar 29, 2010 at 20:06 comment added Qiaochu Yuan You might have better luck posting this kind of question on artofproblemsolving.com. I say this not because the question is inappropriate for MO but because I know there are a lot of strong problem-solvers there who like to think about this kind of question, although a few of them are here...
Mar 29, 2010 at 19:53 comment added Jonas Meyer @José: Based on the tag and the poster's speculative answers below, I guess linear subspace is intended.
Mar 29, 2010 at 19:47 comment added José Figueroa-O'Farrill Is "subspace" here meant in the linear algebraic sense? or the topological sense?
Mar 29, 2010 at 19:37 answer added zhaoliang timeline score: 0
Mar 29, 2010 at 19:18 comment added Pete L. Clark Also, why don't you tell us what you have tried already? For most of these, there are some fairly obvious lower bounds. The question is whether one can do better.
Mar 29, 2010 at 19:05 comment added Pete L. Clark Could you provide some motivation or context to allay the coming worries that this is a homework problem?
Mar 29, 2010 at 19:02 history asked zhaoliang CC BY-SA 2.5