Timeline for Connes' correspondences of two $L^\infty$-algebras
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:37 | answer | added | Danila Zaev | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 14, 2015 at 16:36 | comment | added | Danila Zaev | You are right, thank you. I got confused exactly at this point. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 20:54 | comment | added | Jesse Peterson | Yes, but that is what is unclear to me. How are you associating a finite-additive probability measure on $X \times Y$ to a bi-normal functional on $N \otimes_{max} M^o$? I think this is where the confusion lies. | |
| Feb 13, 2015 at 15:31 | comment | added | Danila Zaev | I'm apologize for an inaccurate formulation. Of course, I mean that with any binormal state we can associate some set function of the specified type, but, as follows from the Connes' assertion, not every such set function corresponds to a binormal state. | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 18:43 | comment | added | Jesse Peterson | I'm not so sure about your last paragraph. Are you sure this is the association given by the Riesz representation theorem? | |
| Feb 12, 2015 at 16:29 | history | edited | Danila Zaev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 46 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2015 at 15:51 | history | edited | Danila Zaev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2015 at 15:33 | history | edited | Danila Zaev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 5 characters in body
|
| Feb 12, 2015 at 15:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 15:44 | |||||
| Feb 12, 2015 at 15:12 | history | asked | Danila Zaev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |