Skip to main content
24 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Mar 5, 2015 at 13:47 vote accept Ali Taghavi
Mar 3, 2015 at 18:41 comment added Ali Taghavi @RasmusBentmann please see the above comment.
Mar 3, 2015 at 18:40 comment added Ali Taghavi @MannyReyes Please see the answer to this post (For $n(M_{n}(\mathbb{C}))$.
Mar 2, 2015 at 10:56 answer added Hannes Thiel timeline score: 6
Feb 10, 2015 at 18:02 comment added Ali Taghavi @MannyReyes please see the above comment.
Feb 10, 2015 at 18:02 comment added Ali Taghavi @RasmusBentmann I receive an interesting link in the comment to this post mathoverflow.net/questions/196182/…
Feb 10, 2015 at 17:20 comment added Ali Taghavi @MannyReyes As I wrote above I realize that my argument is incorrect. Any way I think that if $n(M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ does not go to infinity, the problem about $B(H)$ is not so obvious.
Feb 10, 2015 at 17:14 comment added Ali Taghavi My argument was based on this incomplete idea:let $n-1$ be the maximum rank of matrices in our vector space. So we assume that we have a matrice in the form $I_{n-1}\oplus 0$.Now my error was that I imagined for all other matrices either the last columns or the last array must vanish.
Feb 10, 2015 at 17:13 comment added Rasmus No, I don't have a counterexample.
Feb 10, 2015 at 17:11 comment added Ali Taghavi @RasmusBentmann In fact $n(A)=1$ is necessary and sufficient condition for exsistence of a character.(As a consequence of Gleason Zelazko theoerm. Now I realize that may be my argument of $n(M_{n}(\mathbb{C})$ is not complete. Do you have a counter example?
Feb 10, 2015 at 8:31 comment added Rasmus One small observation is that $n(A)=1$ if $A$ has a character. How did you get $n(M_n(\mathbb C))\geq n$?
Feb 9, 2015 at 10:36 history edited Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 189 characters in body
Feb 9, 2015 at 8:51 comment added Ali Taghavi So it would be interesting to find (and classify) some simple algebra with finite $n(A)$ which is certainly different from "1".
Feb 9, 2015 at 8:43 comment added Ali Taghavi @MannyReyes Yes. As you said, $n(A)=1$ does not implies commutativity. But one can show that $n(A)=1$ can not occur for simple $C^{*}$ algebras. This a consequence of Han Banach theorem and Gleason-Kahane-Zelako theorem
Feb 7, 2015 at 20:37 comment added Manny Reyes this is a good point about $B(H)$, as long as you truly know that $n(M_n(\mathbb{C}) = n$. (I see that it's $\leq n$, but not quite equality.) Regarding $n(A) = 1$, note that for any (not necessarily commutative) unital C*-algebra $B$ one has $n(B \times \mathbb{C}) = 1$.
Feb 7, 2015 at 19:41 comment added Ali Taghavi So the next question would be: "what is the interpretation of finitness of $n(A)$ or $n(A)=1$. Does the later implies commutativity? Thanks again for your comments.
Feb 7, 2015 at 19:39 comment added Ali Taghavi @MannyReyes according to your comment, I think the answer is negative for $B(H)$ since each $M_{n}(\mathbb{C}$ is embeded in $B(H)$. On the other hand this codimension goes to infinity as $n\to \infty$. Am I right?
Feb 7, 2015 at 19:20 comment added Ali Taghavi @MannyReyes thank you for you comment and your revision. No, I do not know how to try this question for $B(H)$. There is no any determinant type function.
Feb 7, 2015 at 19:08 comment added Manny Reyes Have you considered your question for $A = B(H)$, with $H$ an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space?
Feb 7, 2015 at 19:04 history edited Manny Reyes CC BY-SA 3.0
Added three words to make the question match the title and to avoid a trivial answer (the zero subspace).
Feb 7, 2015 at 18:30 history edited Ali Taghavi
edited tags
Feb 7, 2015 at 18:14 history edited Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 300 characters in body; edited tags
Feb 7, 2015 at 18:02 history edited Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 6 characters in body
Feb 7, 2015 at 17:57 history asked Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0