Skip to main content
4 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 9, 2015 at 22:16 comment added HJRW @FrancoisLaudenbach, I would say that a theorem referred to several times in the literature but with no proof written down is the definition of a folk theorem! Clearly the proof was known to Stallings, anyway.
Feb 8, 2015 at 19:55 comment added Ryan Budney @FrancoisLaudenbach: Welcome to MO, Francois!
Feb 8, 2015 at 15:49 comment added user66870 It is a bit more than a folk theorem! The arguments seem similar to those of Stallings' papers on Grushko's theorem and fibration over $S^1$ that I read more than forty years ago. Recently a colleague asked me about the equivalence between Poincaré's conjecture and an algebraic conjecture (conjecture D in "How not to prove..." by Stallings, 1965). There Stallings proved that Conjecture D implies P. IMO, the converse requires Waldhausen's paper on Heegaard splitting of the 3-sphere (1967) and of course, the geometrisation of epimorphisms $\pi_1(S_g)\to F_g$ (not proved in the mentioned paper).
Feb 5, 2015 at 16:30 history answered HJRW CC BY-SA 3.0