Timeline for Why is a topology made up of 'open' sets? Part II
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 23, 2016 at 18:47 | comment | added | LSpice | Surely, of all the flavours of topology, the one uniquely guaranteed not to be pointless is point-set topology? :-) | |
| Mar 28, 2010 at 19:39 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1093 characters in body
|
| Mar 28, 2010 at 19:10 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Anton Geraschenko | ||
| Mar 28, 2010 at 6:55 | comment | added | Minhyong Kim | Hi Deane: My feeling is that even locally Euclidean spaces are sometimes not best thought of metrically for the reasons explained in the question. (2) I didn't want to make precise, but it's perhaps what appears in volume 1 of Massey's two textbooks. And indeed, my concern was mostly with (1)-->(2). | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 23:41 | history | edited | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 27, 2010 at 23:25 | history | answered | Deane Yang | CC BY-SA 2.5 |