Timeline for Computations of the Link homology categorifying the second colored Jones polynomial
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2010 at 6:57 | answer | added | Catharina | timeline score: 2 | |
| Mar 28, 2010 at 11:20 | vote | accept | Charlie Frohman | ||
| Mar 28, 2010 at 4:10 | answer | added | Ben Cooper | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 19:15 | comment | added | Charlie Frohman | What is the status of Stephan Wehrli and Ania Beliakova's approach? | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 19:13 | comment | added | Charlie Frohman | By rank, I mean tensor with the rationals and find the dimension of the corresponding vector space. | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 19:12 | comment | added | Charlie Frohman | For instance I conjecture that the total rank of the homology of the trefoil corresponding to the second Jones Wenzl idempotent, normalized so that the unknot has invariant [3] is 9, and for the figure eight it is 15. | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 19:03 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | If you convince me it would interesting, I might be able to do a few small ones by hand. | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 19:02 | comment | added | Ben Webster♦ | My suspicion is no. At the moment, there doesn't seem to even be consensus on the right way to do the categorification. Obviously, I have some ideas about the right way to do this, and I know Frenkel, Stroppel and Sussan are working on a representation theoretic qpproach which will hopefully be the same (I haven't seen a draft of their paper yet), but there's also things like Khovanov's paper on the subject, which I suspect is not. | |
| Mar 27, 2010 at 17:50 | history | asked | Charlie Frohman | CC BY-SA 2.5 |