Skip to main content
11 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 30, 2015 at 2:06 comment added Douglas Zare One simple observation is that if the distribution is supported on $\mathbb{N} \cup \lbrace -1 \rbrace$ then it can't be an example, since there would never be any overshoot in the negative direction yet asymmetric distributions would have some positive overshooting. Similarly, the distribution has to include a positive probability of taking a positive step of size at least $2$.
Jan 29, 2015 at 20:05 comment added Liviu Nicolaescu It looks to me that you have a one parameter family of random walks, one random walk for every natural number $n$. The random walk $(X_\bullet^n)$ corresponding to $n$ satisfies $X_{k+1}^n=X_k^n$ if $|X_k|\geq n$, and $X_{k+1}^n=X_k+S$ where $S$ is the $\mathbb{Z}$-random variable distributed according to the given (compactly supported) distribution.
Jan 29, 2015 at 18:52 comment added Anthony Quas Trivial comment: From the optional stopping theorem, if the expected one-step displacement is 0, then asymptotically the probability of ending at each barrier is 1/2.
Jan 29, 2015 at 18:50 comment added Anthony Quas @Pace: From the sentence that begins "Obviously", I think it's reasonably clear the OP means symmetric in the sense that the distribution of $X_k-X_{k-1}$ is the same as the distribution of $-(X_k-X_{k-1})$.
Jan 29, 2015 at 18:20 comment added Pace Nielsen Would $P(-2)=1/3$, $P(1)=2/3$ be an asymmetric probability distribution? Or by asymmetry do you mean a distribution where the expected amount of movement on the first step is (say) to the right?
Jan 29, 2015 at 17:59 comment added Timothy Chow O.K., I edited the description.
Jan 29, 2015 at 17:59 history edited Timothy Chow CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 28 characters in body
Jan 29, 2015 at 16:48 comment added Liviu Nicolaescu Could you edit the question so the $n$-s are replaced with the $N$-s in the right places?
Jan 29, 2015 at 16:41 comment added Timothy Chow Maybe it would have been clearer to use different symbols, but yes, I'm asking about a fixed probability distribution that has compact support, and letting the barriers go to infinity.
Jan 29, 2015 at 15:33 comment added Anthony Quas It looks like the $n$ in the set-up is not the same as the $n$ ($N$?) in the question, right? i.e. the range of the displacements are in $[-n,n]$, but the barriers are at $\pm N$
Jan 29, 2015 at 15:10 history asked Timothy Chow CC BY-SA 3.0