Timeline for Irreducible/prime/indivisible elements
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 17, 2015 at 15:07 | comment | added | Jan Grabowski | Oh :-( More work for me then... It's a good idea, though, IMHO - assuming I've understood correctly, it gives a way to say that $x\in k[x,x^{-1}]$ can't be factorised, except as $x^{-1}x^{2}$ or some consequence of this. It's obviously related to irreducibility in the overring $k[x]$ but I wanted an internal notion (actually in a noncommutative setting...). But thanks for the swift reply and (non-)pointer, saves me spending too long looking elsewhere. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 14:15 | comment | added | YCor | @JanGrabowski No, I coined the word to fit this answer. | |
| Nov 17, 2015 at 10:51 | comment | added | Jan Grabowski | Do you have a reference for the definition of quasi-irreducible? (I've tried the usual tactic without much success.) Is quasi-irreducible a standard term? | |
| May 11, 2015 at 7:29 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 21 characters in body
|
| May 11, 2015 at 7:23 | comment | added | ACL | The product of <= 1 field does not admit prime elements. | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 16:00 | vote | accept | GreginGre | ||
| Jan 25, 2015 at 11:52 | history | edited | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
changed type "domain" into "ring" 2 times
|
| Jan 25, 2015 at 11:25 | history | answered | YCor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |