Timeline for Recent trends in effective analysis
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 30, 2015 at 12:03 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Jan 26, 2015 at 1:08 | answer | added | Jason Rute | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 23:48 | answer | added | Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 21:45 | comment | added | François G. Dorais | @JasonRute This is a pretty good answer. Maybe there are a few more details to add, but it's a really good summary of the current state of affairs. Why not post it as an answer? | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 20:19 | history | edited | user60665 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 10 characters in body
|
| Jan 25, 2015 at 15:08 | comment | added | Jason Rute | Yes, it is still an active research area. It however is spread out throughout a number of camps (traditions): The Weihrauch camp, the reverse math camp, the computability theory camp, the randomness camp, the proof theory camp, and a few different constructive math camps. (Also, see many of the quantitative results in classical analysis.) Most researchers span two or more camps, and I don't mean to imply there is a feud or anything. However, there isn't necessarily an organized central list of open problems or a central agenda. You may want to check out cca-net.de as a starting point. | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 14:19 | comment | added | Dirk | I suggest that you copy the titles of the references in the Wikipedia article into, e.g., Google Scholar and look for recent works that cite these works. Seems like there are plenty... | |
| Jan 25, 2015 at 9:27 | history | asked | user60665 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |