Timeline for Reducedness of a ring with prime nilradical
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 22, 2015 at 13:16 | comment | added | MooS | This clarifies everything. Thanks a lot! | |
Jan 22, 2015 at 13:16 | vote | accept | MooS | ||
Jan 22, 2015 at 10:32 | comment | added | Jesse Elliott | If you're looking for a condition on $\mathfrak{q}$, then one such necessary and sufficient condition is that $\mathfrak{q}$ be primary. (Indeed, $\mathfrak{q}$ is primary if and only if the map $A/\mathfrak{q} \longrightarrow (A/\mathfrak{q})_{\mathfrak{p}}$ is injective, which since the image is a field implies that $\mathfrak{q}$ is prime.) Under the assumption that $A/\mathfrak{q}$ is $(R_0)$, the ideal $\mathfrak{q}$ is prime iff it is primary iff it is radical. I'm not sure what else can be said. | |
Jan 22, 2015 at 8:09 | comment | added | MooS | Thank You for your answer. Actually I am aware of this criteria for a Noetherian ring to be reduced and it was precisely what I had in mind when giving the proof. $(R_0)$ is just another term for "generically reduced" and $(S_1)$ is kind a weaker version of Cohen-Macaulay. Actually in my counterexample $A/\mathfrak q$ was one-dimensional, hence Cohen-Macaulay and $(S_1)$ coincide in this ring. Maybe this is the remaining the question now: Is there another sufficient condition in terms of the ideal $\mathfrak q$, that suffices to show that $A/\mathfrak q$ is reduced? | |
Jan 22, 2015 at 6:26 | history | edited | Jesse Elliott | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 167 characters in body
|
Jan 22, 2015 at 6:20 | history | answered | Jesse Elliott | CC BY-SA 3.0 |