Timeline for Is $(\omega+1)^\omega$ with the box topology ultraparacompact?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2015 at 7:57 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | That's right, Ramiro, and thanks for your remark. My question should have been: is there any reason why this sharper version (ultraparacompactness as opposed to paracompactness) doesn't work? Maybe ultraparacompactness is also open... | |
| Jan 20, 2015 at 14:01 | comment | added | Ramiro de la Vega | You probably know that whether $\Box (\omega + 1)^\omega$ is paracompact (in ZFC), is a long-standing open problem. | |
| Jan 20, 2015 at 6:49 | comment | added | Dominic van der Zypen | Please feel free to edit the question and write it in a more understandable way | |
| Jan 19, 2015 at 22:08 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | It seems bad to me to write this like an ordinal power. But what do I know. | |
| Jan 19, 2015 at 16:36 | history | asked | Dominic van der Zypen | CC BY-SA 3.0 |