Timeline for Motivation for cyclic (co)homology
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2019 at 4:29 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Regarding the recent retagging: the KT tag serves useful taxonomy: it doesn't really seem worth adding homology or cohomology tags since the question really is about cyclic (co)homology, not group cohomology or singular homology etc etc etc | |
| Jul 1, 2019 at 4:28 | history | rollback | Yemon Choi |
Rollback to Revision 2
|
|
| Jul 1, 2019 at 4:26 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
the tags (homology) and (cohomohology) seem like a reasonable fit for this question, too
|
|
| Jun 30, 2019 at 18:08 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak |
added a top-level tag; https://meta.mathoverflow.net/questions/1457/why-are-mo-tags-formatted-as-they-are
|
|
| Jan 17, 2015 at 13:38 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | Might this people.math.osu.edu/ramsey.313/papers/CyclicSurvey.pdf be the kind of thing you are looking for? It might help if you explained what you are looking for in terms of "more elementary" applications | |
| Jan 17, 2015 at 12:54 | history | made wiki | Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble | ||
| Jan 17, 2015 at 12:51 | comment | added | quinque | Is there some application which are more elementary than connection with algebraic K-theory? | |
| Jan 17, 2015 at 12:04 | comment | added | Jon Bannon | See page 19 of alainconnes.org/docs/book94bigpdf.pdf | |
| Jan 17, 2015 at 11:29 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 17, 2015 at 11:30 | |||||
| Jan 17, 2015 at 11:26 | history | asked | quinque | CC BY-SA 3.0 |