Timeline for homomorphisms from one Lie group to another
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2015 at 15:13 | history | edited | Rupert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
adding a reference
|
| Jan 14, 2015 at 14:55 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | @Rupert: It would help to add a reference to the article: ams.org/mathscinet-getitem?mr=0379749 (not easily found in all libraries, but should be in the forthcoming edition of his papers). | |
| Jan 14, 2015 at 14:50 | comment | added | user74230 | @Rupert: Yes, it does. | |
| Jan 14, 2015 at 14:29 | history | edited | Rupert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
wanted to clarify that "homomorphism" meant "abstract homomorphism"
|
| Jan 14, 2015 at 14:28 | comment | added | Rupert | I should clarify we're talking about abstract homomorphisms, not continuous ones, does that answer your objection? | |
| Jan 14, 2015 at 14:18 | comment | added | user74230 | So if $G=H=S^1$... | |
| Jan 14, 2015 at 10:59 | comment | added | Rupert | Yes, you're right, it's pretty obvious. I was just confused for a moment because I forgot that $H$ was abelian. | |
| Jan 14, 2015 at 10:46 | comment | added | jmc | The group structure on $\mathrm{Hom}(G,H)$ should just be pointwise addition, right? | |
| Jan 14, 2015 at 10:34 | history | asked | Rupert | CC BY-SA 3.0 |