Timeline for Are there Néron models over higher dimensional base schemes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2015 at 17:13 | comment | added | Question Mark | There is no need to reference the linked arXiv paper: the nontrivial part (i.e., the surjectivity of the generic fiber pullback) of the result is already a special case of 8.4/6 of "Neron models" by Bosch, Lutkebohmert, Raynaud (this reference should be mentioned in the proof of Thm. 3.2 of the linked paper). | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 15:31 | history | edited | user19475 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 60 characters in body
|
| Jan 13, 2015 at 15:19 | comment | added | jmc | I think it would be nice if the accepted answer would expand a little bit. Currently the term “Néron model” isn't even mentioned. | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 15:13 | history | edited | user19475 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jan 13, 2015 at 14:32 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | moved from User.Id=19475 by developer User.Id=69903 | |
| Aug 14, 2018 at 11:57 | |||||
| Jan 13, 2015 at 14:30 | comment | added | user19475 | Yes, you are right, exactly! | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 14:06 | comment | added | jmc | Am I correct when I paraphrase that as "every abelian scheme over $S$ is the Néron model of its general fibre"? However, this doesn't say anything about which $A/\eta$ have a Néron model. But it does say that $g_{*}A$ is the sheaf that is the candidate. Nice to see you returning to your own question after 4 years! | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 13:30 | history | answered | user19475 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |