Timeline for Preservation of properness
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 1, 2015 at 14:45 | comment | added | Victoria Gitman | Ah, yes, of course, ${\rm CH}$ still has to hold, so the assumption is implicit. | |
Mar 1, 2015 at 11:14 | comment | added | Goldstern | To clarify the "removal" of CH: If $P$ is $\sigma$-closed and nontrivial (say: corresponds to an atomless Boolean algebra), then $P$ has size at least continuum. So you still need CH. (You just don't need to mention it as it follows from $|P|=\aleph_1$.) | |
Jan 10, 2015 at 14:52 | history | edited | Victoria Gitman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
got rid of ${\rm CH}$ assumption
|
Jan 10, 2015 at 14:46 | history | edited | Victoria Gitman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
got rid of ${\rm CH}$ assumption
|
Jan 10, 2015 at 1:49 | history | edited | Monroe Eskew | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed a typo
|
Jan 10, 2015 at 1:20 | history | edited | Victoria Gitman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 65 characters in body
|
Jan 10, 2015 at 1:05 | history | answered | Victoria Gitman | CC BY-SA 3.0 |