Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 9, 2015 at 12:46 comment added joro @GerryMyerson I believe your disproved conjecture contradicts the asymptotic of $g(n)$.
Jan 6, 2015 at 15:56 history edited joro CC BY-SA 3.0
added 146 characters in body
Jan 6, 2015 at 15:47 comment added joro @AlexanderBors very good point, thanks! Will try to edit to make it saner...
Jan 6, 2015 at 15:32 comment added Gerry Myerson Yes, there's a smaller example at $n=100=2+3+\cdots+23$, where $g(n)=(16)(9)(5)(7)(11)(13)(17)(19)$.
Jan 6, 2015 at 15:23 comment added joro @GerryMyerson you can verify this in the OEIS b-file: oeis.org/A000793/b000793.txt
Jan 6, 2015 at 15:20 comment added joro @GerryMyerson yours would have been very nice, but I think it can be something else: for $n=\sum_{p \le 43}=281$ g(n) factors as 2^4 * 3^2 * 5^2 * 7 * 11 * 13 * 17 * 19 * 23 * 29 * 31 * 37 * 43
Jan 6, 2015 at 14:59 comment added Gerry Myerson If $n$ is the sum of the first $k$ primes, can $g(n)$ be anything other than the product of those primes?
Jan 6, 2015 at 14:53 comment added Alexander Bors Since $\mathrm{log}\hspace{2pt}g(n)\sim\sqrt{n\cdot\mathrm{log}\hspace{2pt}n}$, the number of ciphers of $g(n)$ alone is already too large to allow for computation in time polynomial in $\mathrm{log}\hspace{2pt}n$ on any infinite set of values for $n$.
Jan 6, 2015 at 12:06 history asked joro CC BY-SA 3.0