Timeline for Uniqueness in Composition of Polynomials
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 25, 2010 at 16:33 | vote | accept | Aeryk | ||
Mar 24, 2010 at 21:01 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 1 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2010 at 20:14 | comment | added | darij grinberg | Thanks, I found the flaw in my proof. It is now fixed to work for the case when $f$ has leading coefficient $1$. The assumptions on $g$ are pretty generic. | |
Mar 24, 2010 at 20:13 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
deleted 1488 characters in body; deleted 14 characters in body; added 16 characters in body; added 4 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2010 at 19:41 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 81 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2010 at 19:35 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 863 characters in body; added 181 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2010 at 19:22 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 146 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2010 at 19:15 | history | edited | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 2193 characters in body; added 32 characters in body
|
Mar 24, 2010 at 18:37 | comment | added | Sergei Ivanov | This argument works for $f(x)=x+const$, the case $f(x)=ax+b$ where $a\ne 1$ is different. | |
Mar 24, 2010 at 18:33 | comment | added | Aeryk | This seems to do the trick for my case: Thanks! I don't know if I'm convinced this will work for "uglier" polynomials in $Z[x]$, like say $f(x)=x+7$ and $g(x)=x^2+3x+9$ ... | |
Mar 24, 2010 at 18:19 | history | answered | darij grinberg | CC BY-SA 2.5 |