Skip to main content

Timeline for Straightening for $\infty$-operads

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 15 at 21:30 vote accept Jonathan Beardsley
May 15 at 21:30 answer added Jonathan Beardsley timeline score: 2
Jan 6, 2015 at 17:07 comment added Jonathan Beardsley @RuneHaugseng I wasn't really doing anything too serious. Just trying to see what it might look like to think about arxiv.org/abs/1102.1234 in terms of $\infty$-categories.
Jan 5, 2015 at 17:40 comment added Rune Haugseng I think that's just a different construction (though related). Certainly you can define the composition product on symmetric sequences in any reasonably nice ordinary symmetric monoidal category (including, say, sets). There's a definition on the nlab that I imagine one could make sense of for $\infty$-categories too... What were you thinking of using this construction for?
Jan 5, 2015 at 15:58 comment added Jonathan Beardsley @RuneHaugseng Lurie seems to imply that stability of the categories is really essential to getting the composition product of symmetric sequences to work. Do you know about this?
Jan 5, 2015 at 13:29 comment added Rune Haugseng For a fixed set of objects, $\infty$-operads should presumably be the associative algebras in "coloured symmetric sequences" in spaces. As far as I know the monoidal $\infty$-category required for this to make sense has not been constructed, though.
Jan 5, 2015 at 9:22 comment added Fernando Muro I think that infinity operads are Quillen equivalent to colored operads of simplicial sets. Does this maybe help?
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:19 comment added Jonathan Beardsley But that seems to depend on stability and presentability.
Jan 5, 2015 at 5:15 comment added Jonathan Beardsley It seems that, in light of section 6.3 of Lurie's Higher Algebra, we can think of $\infty$-operads as monoid objects in symmetric sequences on a symmetric monoidal category?
Jan 5, 2015 at 4:10 history asked Jonathan Beardsley CC BY-SA 3.0