Skip to main content
33 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Aug 14 at 8:39 history edited Martin Sleziak CC BY-SA 4.0
a minor typo
Jul 30 at 7:50 answer added Simon Crase timeline score: 3
Apr 26, 2022 at 11:31 comment added stackoverblown Writing a book takes a lot of time, planning and effort. Time that you can no longer spend on doing your serious research. Why is this not obvious?
Jan 29, 2019 at 6:00 review Close votes
Feb 3, 2019 at 3:05
Dec 30, 2017 at 14:14 review Close votes
Dec 31, 2017 at 15:48
Oct 12, 2017 at 12:57 review Close votes
Oct 12, 2017 at 16:58
Jan 9, 2015 at 18:18 vote accept CommunityBot
Jan 5, 2015 at 20:50 comment added user60665 @AlexandreEremenko Sorry, I wasn't clear: young here means active researchers rather than old professors that don't produce much anymore.
Jan 5, 2015 at 17:02 comment added Alexandre Eremenko Young mathematicians usually do not write basic textbooks, though there are few exceptions. Assuming that you are a young mathematician, I do not understand why are you asking this question.
Jan 4, 2015 at 23:25 comment added darij grinberg (As far as I understand, some publishing houses -- at least Springer -- are grazing the web for lecture notes, which they then try to convince the respective authors to expand into books. I understand the benefits this has for Springer, though I am less convinced of the benefits for the authors...)
Jan 4, 2015 at 23:22 comment added darij grinberg Books often come out of lecture notes written for one's own students. This is not to say that the way from the lecture notes to the finished book is short or easy (it is not), but it is at least shorter than the way from zero to the finished book. Writing lecture notes provides a lecturer with several boons (students are more satisfied and give better evaluations; the lecturer humiliates themself less as mistakes are caught at writing time; doing the same class a second time becomes easier; etc.). Refining them to a book is arguably not highly valued these days...
Jan 4, 2015 at 22:44 history reopened user60665
Joseph O'Rourke
paul garrett
John Stillwell
Timothy Chow
Jan 4, 2015 at 22:42 comment added Timothy Chow David Goodstein once wrote: Feynman was a truly great teacher. He prided himself on being able to devise ways to explain even the most profound ideas to beginning students. Once, I said to him, "Dick, explain to me, so that I can understand it, why spin one-half particles obey Fermi-Dirac statistics." Sizing up his audience perfectly, Feynman said, "I'll prepare a freshman lecture on it." But he came back a few days later to say, "I couldn't do it. I couldn't reduce it to the freshman level. That means we don't really understand it."
Jan 4, 2015 at 21:30 comment added Yemon Choi @anon Low blow. Short answer: for someone who wants to keep their job when they are beiong told to do many other things, the benefits are outweighed by costs
Jan 4, 2015 at 20:39 comment added anon Short answer: for a careerist, the benefits are zero.
Jan 4, 2015 at 19:34 comment added Carlo Beenakker academia.stackexchange.com/questions/5556/…
Jan 4, 2015 at 15:32 history made wiki Post Made Community Wiki by Todd Trimble
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:50 review Reopen votes
Jan 4, 2015 at 16:56
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:38 comment added Gottfried William I don't think this is an opinion based question. It is however an empirical question; in most basic works, the author explains why he or she took the time to write it, how it came about. The answer depends on what is the most frequently given such reason. (And in general, it's obvious from the differences between expositions when a more recent work is compared to texts existing at the time of its writing.)
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:31 history closed Eric Wofsey
Felipe Voloch
Yemon Choi
Carlo Beenakker
Andy Putman
Opinion-based
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:28 answer added Gottfried William timeline score: 23
S Jan 4, 2015 at 14:24 history suggested user44143 CC BY-SA 3.0
Serge Lang is not an example here, because this doesn't provide any data on how his writing affected his research. Papers in mathematical education are also not relevant, since those are about effects on students, not on textbook authors. Moved the positive comment in parentheses to the front.
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:18 review Suggested edits
S Jan 4, 2015 at 14:24
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:59 comment added user60665 @YemonChoi For your first comment: I don't know, that's why I'm asking a question here. For the second one: I assure I'm not: I'm here indeed to see some well-argumented solidly based positions on this matter.
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:38 comment added Yemon Choi I'm afraid it feels to me like you are fishing for answers which will tell you what you want to hear, or confirm your preconceptions. Also, teaching != textbook-writing
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:37 comment added Yemon Choi What makes you think Serge Lang was/is representative? What makes you think the circumstances of his career at that time and in those places generalize to a general discussion as in your question?
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:35 comment added user60665 @YemonChoi I may be wrong, but I don't think that a busy researcher would spend his time writing so many books (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serge_Lang#Books_2) even on really basic material out of sense of service alone without gaining some good: indeed, I heard that teaching is a good way of learning too.
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:25 comment added Yemon Choi Why do you suppose there are any benefits to the author? Maybe it is done out of a sense of service, not to reap any mathematical benefits
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:22 history edited user60665 CC BY-SA 3.0
edited title
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:15 history edited user60665 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 133 characters in body
Jan 4, 2015 at 13:12 review Close votes
Jan 4, 2015 at 14:35
Jan 4, 2015 at 12:53 history edited user60665 CC BY-SA 3.0
added 100 characters in body
Jan 4, 2015 at 12:37 history asked user60665 CC BY-SA 3.0