Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 4, 2015 at 17:40 vote accept Gorka
Jan 4, 2015 at 6:46 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński @YuichiroFujiwara -- thank you for the links. And I let $\ \frac{\binom{\nu}2}{\binom 32}=\frac{\nu\cdot (\nu-1)}{3\cdot 2}\ $ to have somehow just $\ 3\ $ in the denominator--ooops! Sorry.
Jan 4, 2015 at 6:36 history edited Yuichiro Fujiwara CC BY-SA 3.0
Fixed typos including those pointed out in the comment section. Removed the "group theory" tag.
Jan 4, 2015 at 6:31 comment added Yuichiro Fujiwara @WłodzimierzHolsztyński You can find basic facts in the paper I linked to in my post (or those given by Thomas Kalinowski as well, I think). Handbook of Combinatorial Designs is a good reference book for this sort of basic knowledge; coverings are treated in Section 11 of Chapter IV in the 2nd edition. As for the typos, yes, they are not correct, although the number of $3$-subsets in this case is not $\frac{v(v-1)}{3}$ but $\frac{\binom{v}{2}}{\binom{3}{2}} = \frac{v(v-1)}{6}$. I'll edit OP's post.
Jan 4, 2015 at 1:43 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński Your $\ \frac{n(n-1)}2\ $ must be a typo(?). A simple calculation shows that the number of 3-subset of a $\ (\nu\ 3\ 2)\ $ perfect system must be $\ \frac{\nu\cdot(\nu-1)}3\ $ (it's $\ 3,\ $ not $\ 2,\ $ in the denominator). Also then $\ \nu\equiv 1\ or\ 3\mod 6\ $ (rather than $\ 0\ or\ 3).\ $ Thus I feel that it would be nice and useful for non-specialists like me to have a short list of basic results in a separate Answer.
Jan 3, 2015 at 23:39 answer added Yuichiro Fujiwara timeline score: 8
Jan 3, 2015 at 22:28 comment added Włodzimierz Holsztyński I would call the covering designs $\ (v\ k\ 2)\ $-- sloppy planes.
Jan 3, 2015 at 21:18 answer added Thomas Kalinowski timeline score: 10
Jan 3, 2015 at 17:27 history asked Gorka CC BY-SA 3.0