Timeline for Do six consecutive numbers always contain an abundant or perfect number?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2022 at 19:03 | history | edited | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken link fixed, cf. https://meta.mathoverflow.net/q/5301/70594
|
| Jan 6, 2011 at 10:48 | comment | added | Jose Arnaldo Bebita | +1, I liked it very much... =) | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 0:37 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Thanks again for your extension. I will look up Erdos' proof and see if it resembles the sketch I gave above that there exists arbitrarily long sequences which do not contain a deficient number. | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 0:10 | history | edited | Michael Lugo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added third and fourth paragraphs
|
| Mar 23, 2010 at 22:10 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Thank you for answering. I would have been happy for a comment. I'll give you my first up vote. | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 22:09 | comment | added | Michael Lugo | Gerry, I think it does add to the comments. Gerhard Paseman gave a hint that seemed a little bit opaque to me, probably because he believed this was a homework question; I was attempting a bit more transparency. | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 22:07 | history | edited | Michael Lugo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 670 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2010 at 22:01 | comment | added | Gerhard Paseman | Since you answered (and since matrices aren't entertaining me enough right now), can you comment on the density of deficient numbers? Cf. my train of thought in the comments to the question. Gerhard "Ask Me About System Design" Paseman, 2010.03.23 | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 22:01 | comment | added | Gerry Myerson | This doesn't add anything to Gerhard Paseman's comments, does it? | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 21:56 | history | answered | Michael Lugo | CC BY-SA 2.5 |