Timeline for Motivation for strong law of large numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 2.5
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 31, 2010 at 13:37 | vote | accept | Nate Eldredge | ||
| Mar 31, 2010 at 13:36 | vote | accept | Nate Eldredge | ||
| S Mar 31, 2010 at 13:37 | |||||
| Mar 24, 2010 at 15:27 | answer | added | Yuri Bakhtin | timeline score: 7 | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 8:15 | answer | added | Erik Davis | timeline score: 5 | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 1:24 | answer | added | Steve Huntsman | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 1:16 | answer | added | Gjergji Zaimi | timeline score: 19 | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 1:13 | comment | added | Gerald Edgar | I think it is in Chung's undergraduate probability textbook, he juxtaposes two quotations. (I don't have it here now, so cannot check my recolloction.) Both are quoted from famous mathematicians, one saying the weak law is useful and the strong law useless, and the other one saying the opposite. | |
| Mar 24, 2010 at 1:08 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/… | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 21:42 | history | asked | Nate Eldredge | CC BY-SA 2.5 |