Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 7, 2015 at 13:02 history edited ofer zeitouni CC BY-SA 3.0
Removed an incorrect part of the argument
Dec 31, 2014 at 8:46 comment added Nina Holden I posted a comment above with an already published paper implying the lemma. The paper use some similar ideas to the proof sketched above: The number of rectangles of side length $\sim N^{-1}$ containing both $-g$ and $B$, is bounded by $cN^{1/2+\epsilon}$ with high probability, and this is used to prove uniform continuity of $g\mapsto L^g(B)$ on a countable dense subset of $\mathrm{Lip}(M)$.
Dec 28, 2014 at 1:13 comment added Nina Holden Thanks! I think the logarithmic correction is not necessary for the moments. Defining the Brownian motion $\tilde{B}$ by $\tilde{B}_t=\epsilon^{-1/2}B_{\epsilon t}$, and letting $L_t^x$ denote local time at $x$ at time $t$, we have $\epsilon^{-3/2}Z_\epsilon= \epsilon^{-1/2}\sup_x\int_0^1 1_{|\tilde{B}_s-x|<2\epsilon^{1/2}}\,ds \leq 4\sup_x L_1^x(\tilde{B})$. The $p$th moment of the right-hand side is bounded by $C_p$, see e.g. "(Semi-) martingale inequalities and local times" by Barlow and Yor
Dec 27, 2014 at 8:42 history edited ofer zeitouni CC BY-SA 3.0
Added an interpolation that boosts from $\epsilon^{1/2}$ to $\epsilon$ up to log factors.
Dec 25, 2014 at 20:33 history edited ofer zeitouni CC BY-SA 3.0
added 233 characters in body
Dec 25, 2014 at 17:10 comment added ofer zeitouni I did not check step 1 carefully, and you are right, it is flawed. I think that it can be rescued (working with longer intervals), I'll check and will let you know.
Dec 25, 2014 at 15:38 comment added Nina Holden Thanks Ofer. But why do we have $EM_\epsilon\leq C_1$? Defining the Brownian motion $\widehat{B}$ by $B_t=\epsilon \widehat{B}_{t\epsilon^{−2}}$ and change of variables $s=t\epsilon^{-2}$, we get $M_\epsilon=\sup_x \int_0^{ϵ^{-1}} 1_{|\widehat{B}_s−x|<2}ds$, which diverges when $\epsilon\rightarrow 0$.
Dec 24, 2014 at 16:14 history answered ofer zeitouni CC BY-SA 3.0