Skip to main content
Math Jaxed
Source Link
Daniele Tampieri
  • 6.4k
  • 7
  • 30
  • 45

I don't have an actual answer for you, but I'll give you some possibly helpful buzzwords to try to google your way to an answer: stable random vectors. As I understand it (at least in the case p=2$p=2$), the existence of 1-stable random vectors is essentially the positive definiteness of exp(-||x||)$\exp(-\|x\|)$. So you want to know if a 1$1$-stable random vector in R^n$\Bbb R^n$ has a strictly positive density. There are probably probabilists who know this, but I'm not one of them and don't have the time to hunt it down right now.

I don't have an actual answer for you, but I'll give you some possibly helpful buzzwords to try to google your way to an answer: stable random vectors. As I understand it (at least in the case p=2), the existence of 1-stable random vectors is essentially the positive definiteness of exp(-||x||). So you want to know if a 1-stable random vector in R^n has a strictly positive density. There are probably probabilists who know this, but I'm not one of them and don't have the time to hunt it down right now.

I don't have an actual answer for you, but I'll give you some possibly helpful buzzwords to try to google your way to an answer: stable random vectors. As I understand it (at least in the case $p=2$), the existence of 1-stable random vectors is essentially the positive definiteness of $\exp(-\|x\|)$. So you want to know if a $1$-stable random vector in $\Bbb R^n$ has a strictly positive density. There are probably probabilists who know this, but I'm not one of them and don't have the time to hunt it down right now.

Source Link
Mark Meckes
  • 11.4k
  • 3
  • 38
  • 69

I don't have an actual answer for you, but I'll give you some possibly helpful buzzwords to try to google your way to an answer: stable random vectors. As I understand it (at least in the case p=2), the existence of 1-stable random vectors is essentially the positive definiteness of exp(-||x||). So you want to know if a 1-stable random vector in R^n has a strictly positive density. There are probably probabilists who know this, but I'm not one of them and don't have the time to hunt it down right now.