Timeline for Is there any elementary proof of No wandering domain for polynomials
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
10 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:44 | vote | accept | yaoxiao | ||
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:43 | vote | accept | yaoxiao | ||
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:44 | |||||
Dec 25, 2014 at 13:53 | comment | added | Adam Epstein | In this setting there is an infinitesimal treatment via Eicher cohomology. | |
Dec 24, 2014 at 21:49 | comment | added | Ian Agol | You could have a look at this survey on tameness: arxiv.org/abs/1008.0118 This gives a reference to Ahlfors' paper on the finiteness theorem. | |
Dec 24, 2014 at 16:24 | comment | added | yaoxiao | Thank you, professor. Can you recommend some reference about the iteration of Klein Group. | |
Dec 24, 2014 at 16:16 | vote | accept | yaoxiao | ||
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:43 | |||||
Dec 23, 2014 at 21:53 | comment | added | Ian Agol | Sullivan's proof of the no wandering domains theorem is an adaptation of the proof of Ahlfors' finiteness theorem to the context of rational maps. In fact, there is now available a proof of Ahlfors' finiteness theorem which does not make use of quasiconformal deformations. However, it uses 3-dimensional geometric and topological techniques (the geometric tameness theorem). Unfortunately, it would probably be hard to port this argument to the rational maps case. | |
Dec 23, 2014 at 8:30 | answer | added | Lasse Rempe | timeline score: 6 | |
Dec 21, 2014 at 16:31 | answer | added | Igor Rivin | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 21, 2014 at 16:05 | history | asked | yaoxiao | CC BY-SA 3.0 |