Skip to main content
10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:44 vote accept yaoxiao
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:43 vote accept yaoxiao
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:44
Dec 25, 2014 at 13:53 comment added Adam Epstein In this setting there is an infinitesimal treatment via Eicher cohomology.
Dec 24, 2014 at 21:49 comment added Ian Agol You could have a look at this survey on tameness: arxiv.org/abs/1008.0118 This gives a reference to Ahlfors' paper on the finiteness theorem.
Dec 24, 2014 at 16:24 comment added yaoxiao Thank you, professor. Can you recommend some reference about the iteration of Klein Group.
Dec 24, 2014 at 16:16 vote accept yaoxiao
Jan 21, 2015 at 9:43
Dec 23, 2014 at 21:53 comment added Ian Agol Sullivan's proof of the no wandering domains theorem is an adaptation of the proof of Ahlfors' finiteness theorem to the context of rational maps. In fact, there is now available a proof of Ahlfors' finiteness theorem which does not make use of quasiconformal deformations. However, it uses 3-dimensional geometric and topological techniques (the geometric tameness theorem). Unfortunately, it would probably be hard to port this argument to the rational maps case.
Dec 23, 2014 at 8:30 answer added Lasse Rempe timeline score: 6
Dec 21, 2014 at 16:31 answer added Igor Rivin timeline score: 3
Dec 21, 2014 at 16:05 history asked yaoxiao CC BY-SA 3.0