Skip to main content
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
Source Link

How about this: Inaccessible cardinals and Andrew Wiles's proofInaccessible cardinals and Andrew Wiles's proof
I guess turns out to be false that the Wiles proof requires inaccessible cardinals.
But Grothendieck cohomology theories do, so could you perhaps consider them to be "number theory"?

How about this: Inaccessible cardinals and Andrew Wiles's proof
I guess turns out to be false that the Wiles proof requires inaccessible cardinals.
But Grothendieck cohomology theories do, so could you perhaps consider them to be "number theory"?

How about this: Inaccessible cardinals and Andrew Wiles's proof
I guess turns out to be false that the Wiles proof requires inaccessible cardinals.
But Grothendieck cohomology theories do, so could you perhaps consider them to be "number theory"?

Source Link
Gerald Edgar
  • 41.1k
  • 5
  • 125
  • 219

How about this: Inaccessible cardinals and Andrew Wiles's proof
I guess turns out to be false that the Wiles proof requires inaccessible cardinals.
But Grothendieck cohomology theories do, so could you perhaps consider them to be "number theory"?