Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 20, 2014 at 16:09 comment added Michael Renardy Using the fact that u is harmonic, you convert $\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v$ to $\int_{\partial\Omega}{\partial u\over\partial n}v.$ You then end up with $z_t=Az$, where $A$ is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map (well studied in the literature).
Dec 20, 2014 at 13:11 comment added DeleMax @MichaelRenardy Right, but then I'd have to consider $\int_{\partial\Omega}z_t \gamma(v) + \int_\Omega \nabla \gamma^{-1}(z)\nabla v=0 \tag{1}$, for all $v \in L^2(0,T;H^1)$, and substiting $w=\gamma(v)$ gives a different weak formulation which is not equivalent, since the test functions are in $H^1(\Omega)$ for a.e. $t$, and the trace is not invertible on that space (inverse is not surjective). Unless some convenient density result holds, or there is some result about mixed abstract parabolic equations of form (1) I am stuck.
Dec 20, 2014 at 2:09 comment added Michael Renardy Your equation implies that u is harmonic, and with this restriction the trace map is invertible.
S Dec 19, 2014 at 20:10 history suggested Andrew
parabolic tag added
Dec 19, 2014 at 20:05 review Suggested edits
S Dec 19, 2014 at 20:10
Dec 19, 2014 at 17:09 history edited DeleMax CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
Dec 19, 2014 at 16:31 history asked DeleMax CC BY-SA 3.0