Timeline for Existence of solution to weak form of linear equation with boundary integral (parabolic PDE)
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 20, 2014 at 16:09 | comment | added | Michael Renardy | Using the fact that u is harmonic, you convert $\int_\Omega \nabla u\nabla v$ to $\int_{\partial\Omega}{\partial u\over\partial n}v.$ You then end up with $z_t=Az$, where $A$ is the Dirichlet-to-Neumann map (well studied in the literature). | |
Dec 20, 2014 at 13:11 | comment | added | DeleMax | @MichaelRenardy Right, but then I'd have to consider $\int_{\partial\Omega}z_t \gamma(v) + \int_\Omega \nabla \gamma^{-1}(z)\nabla v=0 \tag{1}$, for all $v \in L^2(0,T;H^1)$, and substiting $w=\gamma(v)$ gives a different weak formulation which is not equivalent, since the test functions are in $H^1(\Omega)$ for a.e. $t$, and the trace is not invertible on that space (inverse is not surjective). Unless some convenient density result holds, or there is some result about mixed abstract parabolic equations of form (1) I am stuck. | |
Dec 20, 2014 at 2:09 | comment | added | Michael Renardy | Your equation implies that u is harmonic, and with this restriction the trace map is invertible. | |
S Dec 19, 2014 at 20:10 | history | suggested | Andrew |
parabolic tag added
|
|
Dec 19, 2014 at 20:05 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 19, 2014 at 20:10 | |||||
Dec 19, 2014 at 17:09 | history | edited | DeleMax | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 19, 2014 at 16:31 | history | asked | DeleMax | CC BY-SA 3.0 |