Skip to main content

Timeline for The letters of the word "ART"

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

17 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 21, 2014 at 18:54 comment added Ali Taghavi @JoonasIlmavirta may be for two reason; first thelexicographic(alphabetical order), the second reason: The mathematics has the same nature as ART. My deep thanks for your very interesting answer to this question :)
Dec 21, 2014 at 18:47 comment added Joonas Ilmavirta By the way, why did you choose the word "ART" instead of "TAR" or "RAT"? :)
Dec 21, 2014 at 18:39 history edited Ali Taghavi
edited tags
Dec 21, 2014 at 18:39 vote accept Ali Taghavi
Dec 21, 2014 at 17:38 answer added Will Sawin timeline score: 5
Dec 21, 2014 at 17:27 comment added Joonas Ilmavirta @AliTaghavi, if $U$ is the graph, Mike's example works. Your function gives yet another example, and I think this example can be varied so that $U$ accumulates on any given closed subset of the $y$-axis, giving an infinite number of different spaces with that property. But local connectedness might save your conjecture if you want to assume it.
Dec 21, 2014 at 11:07 history edited Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 75 characters in body
Dec 21, 2014 at 10:53 history edited Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0
added 315 characters in body; edited tags
Dec 21, 2014 at 10:35 comment added Ali Taghavi @MikeJury thank you for your interesting comment. But I think in your example $X-U$ is a closed interval not homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}$. But your interesting example would be true for $(1/x)sin(1/x)$, right?
Dec 19, 2014 at 16:16 comment added Ian Morris Indeed, to avoid examples like Mike's you probably want something a bit stronger like local connectedness or path-connectedness (as well as the Hausdorff property).
Dec 19, 2014 at 15:53 history edited Joonas Ilmavirta CC BY-SA 3.0
Corrected typos.
Dec 19, 2014 at 15:39 comment added Loïc Teyssier @ViditNanda: $U$ is assumed to be homeomorphic to $\mathbb R$, so it is not "arbitrary". Or didn't I understand your comment properly?
Dec 19, 2014 at 14:52 answer added Joonas Ilmavirta timeline score: 16
Dec 19, 2014 at 14:47 comment added Zubin Mukerjee +1 for misleading yet amusing question title
Dec 19, 2014 at 14:43 comment added Mike Jury It's not clear why one would expect there to be only finitely many...for example consider the space $X\subset \mathbb R^2$ formed as the union of the $y$-axis and the graph of the function $f(x)=\sin{(1/x)}$ for $x>0$. It seems that one could construct infinitely many examples by allowing the lines to accumulate on each other in complicated ways like this. Likewise there doesn't seem to be a reason to expect them to all embed in $\mathbb R^2$.
Dec 19, 2014 at 14:24 comment added Vidit Nanda If $U$ is an arbitrary open set (e.g. could be disconnected even if $X$ is not) then wouldn't the letter X also qualify without being homeomorphic to the others?
Dec 19, 2014 at 14:02 history asked Ali Taghavi CC BY-SA 3.0