Skip to main content
edited body
Source Link
user64142
user64142

In information Geometry, there is a definition of dual connection, which is: two affine connections $\nabla$ and $\nabla^*$ are called dual if they satisfied $$X(g(Y,Z))=g(\nabla_XY,Z)+g(X,\nabla^*_XZ)$$$$X(g(Y,Z))=g(\nabla_XY,Z)+g(Y,\nabla^*_XZ)$$ It seems that this definition depends on the metric $g$. My question is could we find another way to define the dual connections above, without the metric involved?

In information Geometry, there is a definition of dual connection, which is: two affine connections $\nabla$ and $\nabla^*$ are called dual if they satisfied $$X(g(Y,Z))=g(\nabla_XY,Z)+g(X,\nabla^*_XZ)$$ It seems that this definition depends on the metric $g$. My question is could we find another way to define the dual connections above, without the metric involved?

In information Geometry, there is a definition of dual connection, which is: two affine connections $\nabla$ and $\nabla^*$ are called dual if they satisfied $$X(g(Y,Z))=g(\nabla_XY,Z)+g(Y,\nabla^*_XZ)$$ It seems that this definition depends on the metric $g$. My question is could we find another way to define the dual connections above, without the metric involved?

Source Link
user64142
user64142

Dual connections for Information Geometry

In information Geometry, there is a definition of dual connection, which is: two affine connections $\nabla$ and $\nabla^*$ are called dual if they satisfied $$X(g(Y,Z))=g(\nabla_XY,Z)+g(X,\nabla^*_XZ)$$ It seems that this definition depends on the metric $g$. My question is could we find another way to define the dual connections above, without the metric involved?