Timeline for Cap product à la Poincaré
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 18, 2014 at 13:32 | comment | added | Danny Ruberman | I think you may be missing Liviu's point: the cap product is an algebraically defined operation; on the chain level it is the adjoint to the cup product. Its notation perhaps suggests intersections, but it is not defined in terms of intersecting anything. To interpret cap and cup products in terms of intersections requires being in a space with some kind of transversality properties, typically a manifold. To get integer-valued intersection numbers, as opposed to mod 2 intersections, requires some orientations. | |
Dec 17, 2014 at 20:43 | comment | added | ARG | So if intersection is only counted mod 2, then there would be no problem whatsoever (except compactness)? | |
Dec 17, 2014 at 16:19 | vote | accept | ARG | ||
Dec 17, 2014 at 16:19 | comment | added | Liviu Nicolaescu | The cap product $\cap: H^k\times H_m\to H_{m-k}$is defined for any (reasonably) behaved space. Only its intersection theoretic interpretation requires the space be oriented manifold. | |
Dec 17, 2014 at 15:08 | history | edited | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
Dec 17, 2014 at 13:43 | history | answered | David E Speyer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |