Skip to main content
added 49 characters in body
Source Link

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^x F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$$$f(\mu)=\mu^{x+1} F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[
    Plot[
        {
            Subscript[\[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 1]]
            + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 2]],

            (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])^(x + 1)
            Hypergeometric2F1[
                x, -t + x, 2 + x, (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])
            ]
        },
        {b, 0, 1}
    ],
    {t, 1, 80, 1},
    {x, 1, 80, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 1], 0, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 2], 0, 1}
]

EDIT: Forgot to add $x+1$ instead of $x$.

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^x F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[
    Plot[
        {
            Subscript[\[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 1]]
            + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 2]],

            (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])^(x + 1)
            Hypergeometric2F1[
                x, -t + x, 2 + x, (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])
            ]
        },
        {b, 0, 1}
    ],
    {t, 1, 80, 1},
    {x, 1, 80, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 1], 0, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 2], 0, 1}
]

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^{x+1} F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[
    Plot[
        {
            Subscript[\[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 1]]
            + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 2]],

            (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])^(x + 1)
            Hypergeometric2F1[
                x, -t + x, 2 + x, (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])
            ]
        },
        {b, 0, 1}
    ],
    {t, 1, 80, 1},
    {x, 1, 80, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 1], 0, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 2], 0, 1}
]

EDIT: Forgot to add $x+1$ instead of $x$.

formatting Mathematica code
Source Link
Bjørn Kjos-Hanssen
  • 24.8k
  • 3
  • 58
  • 114

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^x F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[ Plot[{Subscript[[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b* Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[[Mu], 1]] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)* Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[[Mu], 2]], (bSubscript[[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2])^( x + 1) Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, (bSubscript[[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2])]}, {b, 0, 1}], {t, 1, 80, 1}, {x, 1, 80, 1}, {Subscript[[Mu], 1], 0, 1}, {Subscript[[Mu], 2], 0, 1}]

Manipulate[
    Plot[
        {
            Subscript[\[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 1]]
            + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 2]],

            (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])^(x + 1)
            Hypergeometric2F1[
                x, -t + x, 2 + x, (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])
            ]
        },
        {b, 0, 1}
    ],
    {t, 1, 80, 1},
    {x, 1, 80, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 1], 0, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 2], 0, 1}
]

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^x F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[ Plot[{Subscript[[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b* Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[[Mu], 1]] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)* Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[[Mu], 2]], (bSubscript[[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2])^( x + 1) Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, (bSubscript[[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2])]}, {b, 0, 1}], {t, 1, 80, 1}, {x, 1, 80, 1}, {Subscript[[Mu], 1], 0, 1}, {Subscript[[Mu], 2], 0, 1}]

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^x F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[
    Plot[
        {
            Subscript[\[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 1]]
            + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)*
            Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[\[Mu], 2]],

            (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])^(x + 1)
            Hypergeometric2F1[
                x, -t + x, 2 + x, (b*Subscript[\[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[\[Mu], 2])
            ]
        },
        {b, 0, 1}
    ],
    {t, 1, 80, 1},
    {x, 1, 80, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 1], 0, 1},
    {Subscript[\[Mu], 2], 0, 1}
]
Source Link

Hypergeometric function 2F1 convexity proof:

Suppose $F$ is the Gaussian hypergeometric function 2F1, $x\in \mathbb{N}$, $t>x \in \mathbb{N}$, $\mu \in (0,1)$. Is the function: $$f(\mu)=\mu^x F(x,-t+x,2+x,\mu),$$ convex in $\mu$? I've done some numerical examples that seem to verify this with the following manipulate Mathematica code (apologies for the mess):

Manipulate[ Plot[{Subscript[[Mu], 1]^(x + 1) b* Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[[Mu], 1]] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2]^(x + 1)* Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, Subscript[[Mu], 2]], (bSubscript[[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2])^( x + 1) Hypergeometric2F1[x, -t + x, 2 + x, (bSubscript[[Mu], 1] + (1 - b) Subscript[[Mu], 2])]}, {b, 0, 1}], {t, 1, 80, 1}, {x, 1, 80, 1}, {Subscript[[Mu], 1], 0, 1}, {Subscript[[Mu], 2], 0, 1}]