Timeline for Polynomials of low degree that clone polynomials of higher degree
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 17, 2014 at 1:10 | vote | accept | Turbo | ||
Dec 16, 2014 at 22:41 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | I think so.$\phantom{}$ | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 18:48 | vote | accept | Turbo | ||
Dec 17, 2014 at 0:33 | |||||
Dec 16, 2014 at 9:30 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Here $\deg_k$ is the degree w.r.to $x_k$. For any (non-zero) polynomial $q$, one has $\deg_k(q)=0$ if and only if $q$ does not depend on $x_k$. Then of course $\delta_kq=0$ . So e.g. $p_1\in\mathbb{R}\mathbb[x_2,x_3,\dots,x_{16}]$. | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:55 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Yes, in other words the sum is over all $\epsilon=\sum_{j\in R}e_j$, and $R$ varies among the $2^4$ subsets of $S$ | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:49 | history | edited | Pietro Majer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:42 | history | edited | Pietro Majer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body
|
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:38 | comment | added | Turbo | nice answer I like it. | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:35 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Here $e_k$ is the k-th element of the standard basis, so $x+e_k=(x_1,x_2,\dots,x_k+1,\dots,x_{16})$ | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:34 | history | edited | Pietro Majer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 34 characters in body
|
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:32 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | Yes, I used the same notation as in your post, $x:=(x_1,\dots,x_{16})$ | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:30 | comment | added | Pietro Majer | (I only now realize there is another answer; sorry) | |
Dec 16, 2014 at 8:28 | history | answered | Pietro Majer | CC BY-SA 3.0 |