Timeline for What is the status of the Gauss Circle Problem?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
25 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 29, 2022 at 4:00 | history | edited | Martin Sleziak | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 76 characters in body
|
| S Aug 9, 2021 at 21:53 | history | suggested | Luis Mendo | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Link was not working. I replaced it by the most recent working version on Archive.org
|
| Aug 9, 2021 at 21:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Aug 9, 2021 at 21:53 | |||||
| Feb 1, 2017 at 5:22 | history | edited | GH from MO |
edited tags
|
|
| Sep 12, 2014 at 22:14 | vote | accept | Pete L. Clark | ||
| Sep 10, 2014 at 16:48 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @Lucia: Yes, I had seen it. Thanks for reminding me. | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 16:46 | answer | added | Pete L. Clark | timeline score: 16 | |
| Sep 10, 2014 at 16:45 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Sep 9, 2014 at 15:55 | comment | added | Lucia | Today's arXiv posting by Shaneson arxiv.org/pdf/1409.2446.pdf indicates that he and Cappell were unable to find an ``error-free version" of their announced proof. | |
| Apr 10, 2010 at 16:47 | vote | accept | Pete L. Clark | ||
| Sep 10, 2014 at 16:45 | |||||
| Apr 10, 2010 at 16:46 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @SJ: Prof. Berndt's email contained some information on the Gauss Circle Problem, but nothing definitive on the question at hand. | |
| Apr 10, 2010 at 14:07 | answer | added | fedja | timeline score: 21 | |
| Apr 10, 2010 at 11:57 | comment | added | Sune Jakobsen | ...and what was the answer? | |
| Apr 10, 2010 at 11:30 | answer | added | Junkie | timeline score: 5 | |
| Apr 6, 2010 at 17:24 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Prof. Berndt emailed you today about this. | |
| Apr 4, 2010 at 16:45 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Dear Pete, I emailed you and cc'd Professors Berndt and Soundararajan. Meanwhile I found the latter's 2003 arXiv item and see why he gets exponent (1/4), difference in notation. Anyway arxiv.org/abs/math/0302010v1 | |
| Apr 1, 2010 at 4:50 | comment | added | Will Jagy | Bruce Berndt gave a talk last week at Gainesville that gave history and current status, perhaps not from exactly the same viewpoint as yours of course. See math.ufl.edu/~fgarvan/antc-program/2009-10/mar-focused-week/… | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 19:49 | comment | added | Kevin Buzzard | FWIW I got Huxley to give a talk on his work on the conjecture in our video seminar 18 months ago and IIRC he didn't even mention that someone had claimed to prove the result. | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 17:51 | comment | added | Regenbogen | @Pete L. Clark: Maybe it is a better idea to make it community wiki. The FAQ says that questions on open problems should be so. I think people here have really not thought much about this issue .. I do not know. | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 17:25 | history | edited | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 4 characters in body
|
| Mar 23, 2010 at 15:52 | comment | added | Justin Curry | I'll talk to Shaneson about it and forward the link. | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 2:58 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | I've sent an email to Cappell. I took a few courses from him in the nineties and I think he'll remember me. | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 2:40 | comment | added | Pete L. Clark | @SH: Right, that was almost two years ago. I'm asking for an update from an expert. "Still vetting" is a possible answer, although in that case I'd be interested to know which part is taking so long to check. | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 2:31 | comment | added | Steve Huntsman | Cappell's Wikipedia page says that the paper "is still being vetted by experts." This was originally mentioned on 29 April 2008, but it has not been changed since. | |
| Mar 23, 2010 at 2:05 | history | asked | Pete L. Clark | CC BY-SA 2.5 |