Skip to main content
Comment 3
Source Link

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.
  • Categories with exactly one object are virtually monoids. Thus in the case of monoids we can talk about universal elements rather than universal morphisms. When $\ 1\ $ is universal then we can say that the monoid itself has the fixed-morphism property. The whole theory here is peculiar since there is only one object. If $\ 1\ $ is not universal then no element is.
  • Topic universal maps is a join generalization of the topological dimension theory and of the fixed-point property topic. Some theorems involve--in the same result--the dimension and the fixed point theory (without explicitly mentioning universal maps), and they apply the universal maps in their proof.

(more soon)

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.
  • Categories with exactly one object are virtually monoids. Thus in the case of monoids we can talk about universal elements rather than universal morphisms. When $\ 1\ $ is universal then we can say that the monoid itself has the fixed-morphism property. The whole theory here is peculiar since there is only one object. If $\ 1\ $ is not universal then no element is.

(more soon)

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.
  • Categories with exactly one object are virtually monoids. Thus in the case of monoids we can talk about universal elements rather than universal morphisms. When $\ 1\ $ is universal then we can say that the monoid itself has the fixed-morphism property. The whole theory here is peculiar since there is only one object. If $\ 1\ $ is not universal then no element is.
  • Topic universal maps is a join generalization of the topological dimension theory and of the fixed-point property topic. Some theorems involve--in the same result--the dimension and the fixed point theory (without explicitly mentioning universal maps), and they apply the universal maps in their proof.
Comment 2
Source Link

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.
  • Categories with exactly one object are virtually monoids. Thus in the case of monoids we can talk about universal elements rather than universal morphisms. When $\ 1\ $ is universal then we can say that the monoid itself has the fixed-morphism property. The whole theory here is peculiar since there is only one object. If $\ 1\ $ is not universal then no element is.

(more soon)

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.

(more soon)

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.
  • Categories with exactly one object are virtually monoids. Thus in the case of monoids we can talk about universal elements rather than universal morphisms. When $\ 1\ $ is universal then we can say that the monoid itself has the fixed-morphism property. The whole theory here is peculiar since there is only one object. If $\ 1\ $ is not universal then no element is.

(more soon)

an easy believe
Source Link

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS  

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.

(soonmore soon)

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

COMMENTS  (soon)

The full categorical definition of universal morphism was given in Włodzimierz Holsztyński, Universal Mappings and Fixed Points Theorems, Bull Acad Polon Sci, v.XV, No 7, 1967, pp.433-438:

DEFINITION.   A morphism $\ u: Y\rightarrow X\ $ in category $\ K\ $ is universal $\ \Leftarrow:\Rightarrow\ $ for any morphism $\ f: Y\rightarrow X\ $ there is an object $\ Z\ $ in $\ K\ $ and a morphism $\ p:Z\rightarrow Y\ $ such that $\ g\circ p=u\circ p.\ $ Object X is stable (or has the fixed morphism property; analogous to the fixed-point property) if the identity $\ i_X:X\rightarrow X\ $ is a universal morphism.

In the topological case one considers the full category of the non-empty topological spaces.

COMMENTS

  • There are topological theorems but only one non-obvious general categorical theorem (from late 1960s): Let the finite categorical product $\ \prod_{k=1}^n f_n \ $ of morphisms $\ f:X_{k-1}\rightarrow X_K\ $ be well-defined and universal. Then $\ f_n\circ\ldots\circ f_1 : X_0\rightarrow X_n\ $ is universal too.  (This gives examples of universal maps of finite polyhedra which have non-universal product, already in dimension 2). I have a feeling thought that I can generalize the main theorem of the paper mentioned above to address all categories.

(more soon)

Source Link
Loading