Timeline for Generating Classical Groups over Finite Local Rings
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:58 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://mathoverflow.net/ with https://mathoverflow.net/
|
|
| S Feb 12, 2016 at 20:40 | history | edited | user9072 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Indicating the question asm says he or she meant to ask, reproduced answer as it is deleted
|
| S Feb 12, 2016 at 20:40 | history | suggested | LSpice | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Indicating the question asm says he or she meant to ask
|
| Feb 12, 2016 at 20:35 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 12, 2016 at 20:40 | |||||
| Feb 12, 2016 at 20:34 | history | edited | Todd Trimble | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
converted an answer to an edit of the question
|
| Feb 12, 2016 at 17:32 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 12, 2016 at 17:49 | |||||
| Mar 23, 2010 at 1:27 | answer | added | Bjorn Poonen | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 22, 2010 at 20:42 | comment | added | Jim Humphreys | There are definitely some people who have studied classical groups over commutative rings including local rings, for example N.A. Vavilov (St. Petersburg) and his collaborators. My impression is that results have been somewhat scattered and fragmentary. There are some connections with algebraic K-theory as well. A creative literature search using MathSciNet might be useful. Generation of the groups has been a standard theme, but I doubt that you will find definitive results on maximal subgroups for your rings. | |
| Mar 22, 2010 at 10:58 | comment | added | Harry Gindi | I fixed a problem with your LaTeX caused by jSMath (there was nothing wrong with your LaTeX specifically though, just a bug. | |
| Mar 22, 2010 at 10:57 | history | edited | Harry Gindi | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
fixed LaTeX
|
| Mar 22, 2010 at 10:48 | history | asked | asm | CC BY-SA 2.5 |