Return to Answer

The status as of 2010 is summarized in On a new property of primes that leads to a generalization of Cramer's conjecture . (Firoozbakht's conjecture is slightly stronger than Cramér's, as explained here.)

I find it noteworthy that Farideh Firoozbakht proposed this conjecture (in 1982, not 1992) as an undergraduate student.

The status as of 2010 is summarized in On a new property of primes that leads to a generalization of Cramer's conjecture . (Firoozbakht's conjecture is slightly stronger than Cramér's, as explained here.)

I find it noteworthy that Farideh Firoozbakht proposed this conjecture as an undergraduate student.

The status as of 2010 is summarized in On a new property of primes that leads to a generalization of Cramer's conjecture . (Firoozbakht's conjecture is slightly stronger than Cramér's.)

I find it noteworthy that Farideh Firoozbakht proposed this conjecture (in 1982, not 1992) as an undergraduate student, as she explains here.

The status as of 2010 is summarized in On a new property of primes that leads to a generalization of Cramer's conjecture . (Firoozbakht's conjecture is slightly stronger than Cramér's, as explained here.)

I find it noteworthy that Farideh Firoozbakht proposed this conjecture (in 1982, not 1992) as an undergraduate student.

The status as of 2010 is summarized in On a new property of primes that leads to a generalization of Cramer's conjecture . (Firoozbakht 1982 conjecture and Cramér's 1936 conjecture are closely related.)

The status as of 2010 is summarized in On a new property of primes that leads to a generalization of Cramer's conjecture . (Firoozbakht's conjecture is slightly stronger than Cramér's.)

I find it noteworthy that Farideh Firoozbakht proposed this conjecture (in 1982, not 1992) as an undergraduate student, as she explains here.