Timeline for Have there been any new developments in the Firoozbakht conjecture? [duplicate]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2014 at 18:37 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | @KarlSchwede: indeed, and that question was closed for a reason - the OP for that question certainly did not follow any conventional etiquette patterns, to put it mildly. In any case, you can see that the answer to that question was updated in 2013, so not that long ago. Plus, the very first comment to that question states, "I suppose any progress made on a conjecture of such importance would be easily located by google", and I could not agree more. | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 16:14 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | That's true, but the other question was closed. | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 8:01 | review | Reopen votes | |||
| Dec 10, 2014 at 23:03 | |||||
| Dec 9, 2014 at 15:49 | history | closed |
j.c. Stefan Kohl♦ Felipe Voloch Stefan Waldmann Ricardo Andrade |
Duplicate of Any progress on the Firoozbakht Conjecture? [closed] | |
| Dec 9, 2014 at 14:54 | comment | added | Felipe Voloch | @KarlSchwede As explained in Carlo's answer, this is slighty stronger than a 80-year old conjecture of Cramer, which is NOT a consequence of the Riemann hypothesis. I don't think you should expect new developments every few years and, if there are, you'll hear about them. | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 23:00 | comment | added | Karl Schwede | I voted to leave this open because the "duplicate" question was nearly 3 years old. | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 18:29 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 9, 2014 at 15:49 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 17:51 | comment | added | Vladimir Dotsenko | mathoverflow.net/questions/90327/… - I had an impression from discussing this with various people back then that this conjecture is very unlikely to be true... | |
| S Dec 8, 2014 at 17:03 | history | suggested | TRiG | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Formatted quote as blockquote. Removed strange parenthesis. Corrected spelling.
|
| Dec 8, 2014 at 17:02 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Dec 8, 2014 at 17:03 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:52 | vote | accept | Safwane | ||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:50 | vote | accept | Safwane | ||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:52 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:47 | history | edited | Safwane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:40 | vote | accept | Safwane | ||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 14:47 | |||||
| Dec 8, 2014 at 13:27 | answer | added | Carlo Beenakker | timeline score: 6 | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 12:58 | history | asked | Safwane | CC BY-SA 3.0 |