Timeline for Generalization of Giroux's Theorem for Higher Dimensions?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2015 at 5:20 | comment | added | John Pardon | Hi Patrick! I've edited the answer, and hopefully it is correct now. | |
| Jan 9, 2015 at 5:19 | history | edited | John Pardon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added orientation condition as per Patrick Massot's comment
|
| Jan 8, 2015 at 10:22 | comment | added | Patrick Massot | For the record, one must point out that there are very important orientation assumptions to be added to the definition, see Giroux's paper. | |
| Dec 8, 2014 at 0:21 | vote | accept | Guest | ||
| Dec 7, 2014 at 1:39 | comment | added | John Pardon | See the edit above. The binding is just any codimension two submanifold, not necessarily a sphere. | |
| Dec 7, 2014 at 1:38 | history | edited | John Pardon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 147 characters in body
|
| Dec 7, 2014 at 1:29 | comment | added | Guest | Thanks, what do we mean by the binding in higher dimensions? For dimension 3 we have an $S^1$ -knot, what do we have for higher dimensions, some special embedding, maybe an isomorphic embedding of $S^{2n+1-2}=S^{2n-1}$ in $M^{2n+1}$? | |
| Dec 7, 2014 at 1:23 | history | answered | John Pardon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |