Timeline for Clarification about Joyal's notation [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2014 at 12:17 | history | closed |
Ricardo Andrade Ryan Budney Daniel Moskovich S. Carnahan♦ |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Dec 11, 2014 at 10:28 | comment | added | Daniel Moskovich | I suggest closing as no longer relevant. | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 20:29 | comment | added | Edoardo Lanari | I was going to, but I solved my doubt (which was quite silly: I immediately thought of the discrete simplicial set given by the 0-cells, but at a first glance I couldn't see why it was a subobject of the starting simplicial set) | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 18:36 | comment | added | Ryan Budney | Have you tried e-mailing him? | |
| Dec 10, 2014 at 13:38 | review | Close votes | |||
| Dec 12, 2014 at 12:17 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2014 at 21:41 | answer | added | user62675 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 16:17 | comment | added | Edoardo Lanari | Yes, I have just figured it out by myself by looking at his notes on simplicial homotopy theory. I am pretty sure he means the 0-skeleton of $A$, i.e. the discrete simplicial set associated to the 0-simplexes of $A$. Should I erase the question or leave it for others with the same doubt? | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 16:09 | comment | added | Zhen Lin | I would guess, based on the statement of Theorem C, that $A_0$ is simply the set of vertices of $A$. If you prefer, you can think of it as a discrete simplicial set. | |
| Dec 6, 2014 at 16:05 | history | asked | Edoardo Lanari | CC BY-SA 3.0 |