Timeline for Does the polynomial De Rham functor preserves finite cartesian products?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 10, 2015 at 7:13 | history | edited | მამუკა ჯიბლაძე | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
de Rham
|
| Dec 6, 2014 at 12:32 | comment | added | Cepu | I was interested to find some special cases such that 2) is true. But using the Eilenberg Zielber theorem I think that 2) is always false, even with the standard simplicial sets $X=\Delta^{n}$ and $Y=\Delta^{m}$. | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 20:10 | comment | added | Matthias Wendt | I think that 1) is a consequence of the Eilenberg-Zilber theorem and the quasi-isomorphism between the polynomial differential forms and the rational cochains. For 2), why would you want an isomorphism, quasi-isomorphism seems the more natural thing to ask. | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 18:53 | comment | added | Yemon Choi | For which $K$ and $L$ have you been able to verify this tensor formula? | |
| Dec 4, 2014 at 18:18 | history | edited | Cepu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body; edited title
|
| Dec 4, 2014 at 18:13 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 4, 2014 at 18:15 | |||||
| Dec 4, 2014 at 18:12 | history | asked | Cepu | CC BY-SA 3.0 |