Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 4, 2014 at 21:27 history closed Felipe Voloch
Ian Morris
Peter Michor
Neil Strickland
Lucia
Duplicate of Hilbert's Theorem on $L_2$ norm of polynomials in $\mathbb{Z}[X]$ - Explicit construction and a converse?
Dec 4, 2014 at 21:12 vote accept john mangual
Dec 4, 2014 at 10:33 review Close votes
Dec 4, 2014 at 21:27
Dec 4, 2014 at 6:12 answer added Noam D. Elkies timeline score: 11
Dec 4, 2014 at 5:55 comment added Manfred Weis to me it seems that the answer depends on the values of $a$ and $b$; if both are in the in the open interval $(-1,+1)$, then the infimum is $0$ and no minimum exists. I would therefore suggest to first clarify, how the answer is for $a=0,b\ge 1$ i.e. how it depends on $b$ in that case.
Dec 4, 2014 at 5:08 comment added Gerry Myerson But the last line of the question still says "integer-valued".
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:40 history edited Michael Renardy CC BY-SA 3.0
I assume you want f to be nonzero, otherwise there is an easy answer.
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:28 review Suggested edits
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:30
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:10 comment added john mangual @FelipeVoloch you are right. I have corrected the title
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:10 history edited john mangual CC BY-SA 3.0
fixed an important typo
Dec 4, 2014 at 3:03 comment added Felipe Voloch Integer valued polynomials is not the same as polynomials with integer coefficients. Which one do you want?
Dec 4, 2014 at 1:49 history edited Noam D. Elkies CC BY-SA 3.0
$a_n \in \bf Z$, not $a$ which is the left endpoint
Dec 4, 2014 at 1:38 comment added BigM You might find this LINK useful.
Dec 4, 2014 at 1:30 history asked john mangual CC BY-SA 3.0